ErrorKMI panel rulingPenaltyMinorGrumbles

Penalty not given for André challenge on Kevin Schade

BREBrentford2 – 2Wolverhampton WanderersWOL

Monday, 16 March 2026 · 2025-26 · —

What happened

Penalty not given for André challenge on Kevin Schade. The KMI panel ruled the on-field decision wrong, but not a clear and obvious error, so VAR was right not to intervene.

On the pitch: Penalty not given for André challenge on Kevin Schade
VAR: VAR confirmed
Benefited: WOL Wolverhampton Wanderers
Harmed: BRE Brentford

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brentford fans, Wolverhampton Wanderers fans and everyone else answered.

Sources

Officials & their calls

RefereeStuart AttwellErrorcareer on file: 11 err · 59%VARPaul HowardCorrectcareer on file: 1 err · 95%Assistant VARSian Massey-EllisCorrectcareer on file: 1 err · 93%

What the fans thought

Grumbles26

1 of 46 comments in the r/soccer post-match thread were angry about the officiating, mostly from Brentford fans. Main gripes: penalty.

“Same s*** different week. Last 6 games shoulda lost all of them. Obviously not helped by VAR who missed a stone wall penalty on schade and a passback so obvious Stevie Wonder could have seen it but that's not an excuse f…” · 20 upvotes · BRE fan

Whole-match mood, not this incident alone.

Something wrong or missing?

This record is community-maintained. If there's a panel ruling, a better source or a correction, send it in.

Edit on GitHub Report a correction

What happened

Sources

Related incidents

Kluivert equaliser stands after VAR checks the build-up

No penalty for Ajer's shot striking Truffert's arm

Sunderland given a penalty when Ballard pulled Konsa

Saka penalty and second yellow for Reinildo