h/chelseaCommunities ▾
CHE

h/chelsea

Chelsea fans

📌 Community highlights

PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Goal

Calafiori goal ruled out for Konsa offside (ARS 2–1 CHE, 12')

Refereeing CallAwaiting panel

Riccardo Calafiori bundled the ball in after Ezri Konsa's effort hit the post and Emi Martínez smothered the rebound. VAR ruled it out because Konsa was in an offside position. Arsenal went on to win 2-1 through Havertz and Ødegaard.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Arsenal fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

DOGSO dismissal not given: challenge by Dunk on Pedro (CHE 4–3 BHA, 70')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

DOGSO dismissal not given: Challenge by Dunk on Pedro. Panel: The panel supported the referee's call of no red card for a DOGSO offence. The play was wide, a long way from goal, with a covering defender in a central position - all mitigating against an obvious goal-scoring opportunity.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Brighton & Hove Albion fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Goal awarded: kostoulas in an onside position (CHE 4–3 BHA, 35')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

Goal awarded: Kostoulas in an onside position. Panel: The on-field onside decision to award the goal was supported.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Brighton & Hove Albion fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

DOGSO dismissal not given: challenge by Colwill on Bobb (FUL 2–3 CHE, 5')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

DOGSO dismissal not given: Challenge by Colwill on Bobb. Panel: The Referee's call of a yellow card for a potential DOGSO was supported with the attacker playing the ball away from goal; so this was not considered an obvious goalscoring opportunity.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Sending off dismissal not given: challenge by Lavia on Bassey (FUL 2–3 CHE, 12')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

Sending off dismissal not given: Challenge by Lavia on Bassey. Panel: The challenge by Lavia on Bassey was judged to be low, reckless, and lacked the force and intensity for a red card. The Referee's call of a yellow card for a reckless challenge was supported.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Penalty not awarded: handball appeal against Robinson (FUL 2–3 CHE, 19')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Robinson. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Robinson was supported, 4:1. The ball comes off his head before making contact with his arm as he is stooping to clear. One panellist felt that the movement of Robinson's right arm was deliberate and a penalty should have been awarded.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Goal awarded: pedro in an onside position (FUL 2–3 CHE, 49')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

Goal awarded: Pedro in an onside position. Panel: The on-field onside decision to award the goal was supported.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Goal not awarded: quenda in an offside position (FUL 2–3 CHE, 90')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

Goal not awarded: Quenda in an offside position. Panel: The on-field offside decision to disallow the goal for an offence against Quenda was supported.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Cole Palmer goal ruled out by VAR (LIV 1–1 CHE, 50')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Liverpool fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

João Pedro goal ruled out by VAR (CHE 1–3 NFO, 75')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Penalty to Nottingham Forest after VAR review (CHE 1–3 NFO, 13')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

The penalty was awarded following a VAR review. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via BBC Sport

Penalty not given for James Tarkowski holding Wesley Fofana (EVE 3–0 CHE, —)

Refereeing CallError

Penalty not given for James Tarkowski holding Wesley Fofana. The KMI panel ruled the on-field decision wrong, but not a clear and obvious error, so VAR was right not to intervene.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Everton fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via BBC Sport

Penalty not given for Reece James holding Malick Thiaw (CHE 0–1 NEW, —)

Refereeing CallError

Penalty not given for Reece James holding Malick Thiaw. The KMI panel ruled the on-field decision wrong, but not a clear and obvious error, so VAR was right not to intervene.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Newcastle United fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Ollie Watkins goal ruled out by VAR (AVL 1–4 CHE, 42')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via BBC Sport

Penalty not given for a Declan Rice handball (ARS 2–1 CHE, —)

Refereeing CallError

Penalty not given for a Declan Rice handball. The KMI panel ruled the on-field decision wrong, but not a clear and obvious error, so VAR was right not to intervene.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Arsenal fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via BBC Sport

Cole Palmer escapes a second yellow card (CHE 2–2 LEE, —)

Refereeing CallError

The KMI panel ruled that Cole Palmer should have been shown a second yellow card. Second cautions were not reviewable by VAR in 2025-26.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Leeds United fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via BBC Sport

Penalty not given for a challenge by Sá on João Pedro (WOL 1–3 CHE, —)

Refereeing CallError

Penalty not given for a challenge by Sá on João Pedro. The KMI panel ruled the on-field decision wrong, but not a clear and obvious error, so VAR was right not to intervene.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Wolverhampton Wanderers fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Jean-Clair Todibo red card after VAR review (CHE 3–2 WHU, 90'+10')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

The card was upgraded to red after a VAR review. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, West Ham United fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via BBC Sport

Chelsea penalty for Canvot handball given on review, arm in normal position (CRY 1–3 CHE, 60')

Refereeing CallError

Jaydee Canvot was penalised for handball after a VAR review, but the KMI panel ruled his arm was by his side in a normal position and the ball came up off his hip.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Crystal Palace fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

João Pedro goal given after VAR review (CHE 2–0 BRE, 27')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

The goal was initially not given, but awarded after a VAR review. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Brentford fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Harry Wilson goal ruled out by VAR (FUL 2–1 CHE, 45'+5')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Enzo Fernández goal given after VAR review (MCI 1–1 CHE, 90'+5')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

The goal was initially not given, but awarded after a VAR review. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester City fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments