Post Match Thread: Coventry City 0-5 Brighton & Hove Albion | Premier League
Rate the refereeing in COV 0–5 BHA
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Coventry City fans, Brighton & Hove Albion fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in COV 0–5 BHA
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Coventry City fans, Brighton & Hove Albion fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in MUN 0–1 MCI
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester United fans, Manchester City fans and everyone else answered.
Taiwo Awoniyi caught Maxim De Cuyper in the face while challenging for a header and got a straight red for violent conduct. VAR Peter Bankes checked and confirmed it. Alan Shearer questioned what Awoniyi was supposed to do differently.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Coventry City fans, Brighton & Hove Albion fans and everyone else answered.
Charalampos Kostoulas was fouled in the box and Pascal Groß scored from the spot for 3-0 against ten-man Coventry.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Coventry City fans, Brighton & Hove Albion fans and everyone else answered.
After an untidy tangle, Phil Foden kicked out into Bruno Fernandes' body. Michael Oliver showed a straight red and VAR confirmed it after a quick check. City played more than an hour with ten men and still won.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester United fans, Manchester City fans and everyone else answered.
Erling Haaland tapped in Joško Gvardiol's deflected cross at the far post. The assistant flagged, but after a long check VAR Matt Donohue overturned it, judging that Enzo Fernández, who was in an offside position in front of goal and lunged at the cross, had not affected Lisandro Martínez. It was the only goal of the game, scored by ten-man City at Old Trafford. Pro Ref admitted the error the same day.
Should Haaland's goal have stood?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester United fans, Manchester City fans and everyone else answered.
Should Bruno Fernandes have been punished too?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester United fans, Manchester City fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in AVL 1–2 NFO
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in BOU 2–2 BRE
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Bournemouth fans, Brentford fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in CHE 2–2 HUL
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Hull City fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in CRY 2–3 IPS
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Crystal Palace fans, Ipswich Town fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in LIV 0–0 FUL
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Liverpool fans, Fulham fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in TOT 0–0 EVE
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Tottenham Hotspur fans, Everton fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in SUN 0–2 ARS
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Sunderland fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Justin Kluivert fired through Jaidon Anthony's legs after the ball broke loose from Kristoffer Ajer's tackle on Evanilson. The goal was confirmed after a VAR review.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Bournemouth fans, Brentford fans and everyone else answered.
Deep in first-half stoppage time, Kristoffer Ajer's goal-bound shot appeared to hit the arm of the falling Adrien Truffert. Jarred Gillett consulted VAR, gave nothing and blew for half-time.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Bournemouth fans, Brentford fans and everyone else answered.
Axel Disasi caught Jack Clarke on the shin with his studs and Chris Kavanagh showed a straight red for serious foul play. Ten-man Palace lost 3-2.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Crystal Palace fans, Ipswich Town fans and everyone else answered.
At 0-0 after a Sunderland corner, John Brooks gave a penalty for Ezri Konsa's challenge on Dan Ballard. Replays showed Ballard pulling Konsa's shirt with his left arm, which spun the Arsenal defender into him. Stuart Attwell confirmed the penalty on VAR. If anything, it should have been a free-kick to Arsenal. Arsenal won 2-0 anyway.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Sunderland fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Reinildo Mandava brought down Bukayo Saka in the box, earned a second yellow card and conceded a penalty. Saka scored it himself for 2-0.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Sunderland fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in EVE 2–2 MUN
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Everton fans, Manchester United fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in ARS 2–1 CHE
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Arsenal fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.
Riccardo Calafiori bundled the ball in after Ezri Konsa's effort hit the post and Emi Martínez smothered the rebound. VAR ruled it out because Konsa was in an offside position. Arsenal went on to win 2-1 through Havertz and Ødegaard.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Arsenal fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in NEW 2–2 BOU
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Newcastle United fans, Bournemouth fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in BRE 1–1 SUN
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brentford fans, Sunderland fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in BHA 1–1 LEE
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Leeds United fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in FUL 2–3 CRY
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Crystal Palace fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in MCI 1–0 COV
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester City fans, Coventry City fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in NFO 0–0 TOT
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Nottingham Forest fans, Tottenham Hotspur fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in HUL 0–0 AVL
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Hull City fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Igor Thiago's cross caused confusion between Ballard and goalkeeper Robin Roefs, and Jaidon Anthony bundled the ball over the line. VAR quickly intervened and the goal was ruled out for a foul on Roefs, who appeared to have both hands on the ball.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brentford fans, Sunderland fans and everyone else answered.
Dan Ballard's low drive went in, but VAR sent Tom Bramall to the monitor to judge whether Kevin Danso, standing in an offside position, had blocked Caoimhín Kelleher's line of vision. Bramall took almost five minutes before ruling it out.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brentford fans, Sunderland fans and everyone else answered.
Sunderland were given a penalty when Wilson Isidor was fouled in the box. Enzo Le Fée converted for the 1-1 equaliser.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brentford fans, Sunderland fans and everyone else answered.
Daichi Kamada finished off a move involving Eddie Nketiah and Yéremy Pino, but VAR ruled him offside at the moment of the pass by the finest of margins. Palace came back to win 3-2 anyway.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Crystal Palace fans and everyone else answered.
Williams scored for Forest, but the ball had hit his arm immediately before he put it in. A goalscorer's accidental handball is still an offence, so the goal was disallowed and VAR confirmed it. The game finished 0-0.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Nottingham Forest fans, Tottenham Hotspur fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in IPS 0–2 LIV
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Ipswich Town fans, Liverpool fans and everyone else answered.
Cody Gakpo was brought down by Abdul Fatawu near the edge of the area. Darren England played on and VAR checked in the background without intervening. Former PGMOL chief Keith Hackett called it a nailed-on penalty.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Ipswich Town fans, Liverpool fans and everyone else answered.
VAR sent Darren England to the monitor over Leif Davis' challenge on Dominik Szoboszlai. England accepted it was a foul he had missed, but Szoboszlai had been offside in the build-up, so there was no penalty.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Ipswich Town fans, Liverpool fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in AVL 0–1 ARS
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Kamara on Havertz. Panel: The panel supported the referee's call of no penalty with the contact made being below the threshold for a penalty.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Torres on Calafiori. Panel: The panel supported the referee's call of no penalty with the contact made being below the threshold for a penalty.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Second caution dismissal not given: Challenge by Tzolis on McGinn. Panel: The non-award of a second caution was unanimously supported with a good advantage played and therefore the challenge did not stop the promising attack. The panel also felt that the first caution was below the threshold.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by White on Maatsen. Panel: The panel supported the referee's call of no penalty with the contact made being below the threshold for a penalty.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
In the eighth minute of added time, Ian Maatsen, already on a yellow, caught Bruno Guimarães' standing leg without touching the ball. Jarred Gillett played on and VAR did not recommend a review. The KMI panel ruled 5-0 that it was a penalty and a second yellow. Arsenal won 1-0 through Saka regardless.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty awarded: Challenge by Maatsen on Saka. VAR intervened and the decision was overturned. Panel: The VAR intervention to award a free kick instead of a penalty was unanimously supported with the foul occurring just outside the area.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in CHE 4–3 BHA
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Brighton & Hove Albion fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in LEE 1–1 BRE
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Leeds United fans, Brentford fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in SUN 1–0 FUL
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Sunderland fans, Fulham fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in MUN 5–2 IPS
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester United fans, Ipswich Town fans and everyone else answered.
DOGSO dismissal not given: Challenge by Dunk on Pedro. Panel: The panel supported the referee's call of no red card for a DOGSO offence. The play was wide, a long way from goal, with a covering defender in a central position - all mitigating against an obvious goal-scoring opportunity.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Brighton & Hove Albion fans and everyone else answered.
Goal awarded: Kostoulas in an onside position. Panel: The on-field onside decision to award the goal was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Brighton & Hove Albion fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Bogle on Schade. Panel: The panel felt that a penalty should have been awarded for a foul by Bogle on Schade, 4:1. There was foot on foot contact instigated by Bogle with enough contact for a penalty kick. However, given the high threshold for VAR intervention, the panel felt the referee's call should remain on-field as it wasn't a clear and obvious error, 3:2.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Leeds United fans, Brentford fans and everyone else answered.
Sending off dismissal not given: Challenge by Fatawu on Mbuemo. Panel: The referee's call of no red card for a challenge by Fatawu on Mbuemo was unanimously supported as correct. The challenge was low, reckless, and lacking the excessive force required for serious foul play.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester United fans, Ipswich Town fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty awarded: Challenge by Greaves on Cunha. Panel: The on-field call of a penalty was unanimously supported. A clear foul by Greaves on Cunha as he ran through on goal with a correct yellow card for DOGSO as it was a genuine challenge for the ball.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester United fans, Ipswich Town fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by O'Shea on Tielemans. Panel: The referee's call of no penalty was supported. There was an arm placed on the back of Tielemans, but far below the threshold for a penalty.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester United fans, Ipswich Town fans and everyone else answered.
At 1-1, Harry Maguire charged down a Chuba Akpom clearance with his arms and shot. The ball went in off Jacob Greaves' ankle. Because Maguire was not the immediate scorer, his accidental handball could not be punished, so the goal stood. It was correct under the Laws but widely criticised. The KMI panel backed the call 4-1: Maguire's arms were within his bodyline, so the contact was accidental, and he was not the goalscorer.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester United fans, Ipswich Town fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in LIV 2–2 NFO
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Liverpool fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in BOU 1–1 EVE
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Bournemouth fans, Everton fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in COV 0–1 HUL
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Coventry City fans, Hull City fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in TOT 0–2 NEW
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Tottenham Hotspur fans, Newcastle United fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Hill on Dewsbury-Hall. Panel: The referee's call of no penalty was supported with this being deemed a collision between the two players rather than a foul.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Bournemouth fans, Everton fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Tavernier on Tarkowski. Panel: The referee's call of no penalty was supported, with both players engaging in holding actions that are below the threshold for being penalised.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Bournemouth fans, Everton fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Scott. Panel: The referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Scott was supported as the arm was in a justifiable position.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Bournemouth fans, Everton fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Thomas on Stroud. Panel: The referee's call of no penalty was supported, with the contact not meeting the threshold for a penalty kick.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Coventry City fans, Hull City fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty awarded: Challenge by Alisson on Williams. Panel: The panel felt that the referee's call of a penalty was incorrect on-field, 3:2. The contact from Allison was inevitable as a consequence of his momentum in attempting to save the ball - the contact made was not reckless and below the threshold for a penalty. However, the non-intervention by the VAR was unanimously supported on the basis that it was not a clear and obvious error.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Liverpool fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.
Goal awarded: Jesus in an onside position. Panel: The on-field onside decision to award the goal was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Liverpool fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.
Goal awarded: Frimpong in an onside position. VAR intervened and the decision was overturned. Panel: The VAR overturn to disallow the goal for an offside offence against Frimpong was supported. When the ball was played, by Wirtz, Frimpong was in an offside position and then plays the ball himself. Whilst the pass makes contact with a defender this is not a 'controlled action'.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Liverpool fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Thiaw on Marmoush. Panel: The referee's call of no penalty was supported, 4:1. There was a genuine challenge for the ball by Thiaw with some contact made with Marmoush, but this was below the threshold for a penalty kick.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Tottenham Hotspur fans, Newcastle United fans and everyone else answered.
Goal awarded: Dedic in an onside position. Panel: The on-field decision to award the goal was supported, with the close margin falling within the thicker lines, leading to an onside outcome.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Tottenham Hotspur fans, Newcastle United fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Botman. Panel: The referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Botman was supported. The ball strikes his arm, by his side, in an expected position.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Tottenham Hotspur fans, Newcastle United fans and everyone else answered.
Goal awarded: Wissa in an onside position. Panel: The on-field onside decision to award the goal was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Tottenham Hotspur fans, Newcastle United fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in CRY 1–4 MCI
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Crystal Palace fans, Manchester City fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Strand Larsen. Panel: The referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Strand Larsen was supported. The ball struck him on the thigh before deflecting onto his arm.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Crystal Palace fans, Manchester City fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in FUL 2–3 CHE
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.
DOGSO dismissal not given: Challenge by Colwill on Bobb. Panel: The Referee's call of a yellow card for a potential DOGSO was supported with the attacker playing the ball away from goal; so this was not considered an obvious goalscoring opportunity.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.
Sending off dismissal not given: Challenge by Lavia on Bassey. Panel: The challenge by Lavia on Bassey was judged to be low, reckless, and lacked the force and intensity for a red card. The Referee's call of a yellow card for a reckless challenge was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Robinson. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Robinson was supported, 4:1. The ball comes off his head before making contact with his arm as he is stooping to clear. One panellist felt that the movement of Robinson's right arm was deliberate and a penalty should have been awarded.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.
Goal awarded: Pedro in an onside position. Panel: The on-field onside decision to award the goal was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.
Goal not awarded: Quenda in an offside position. Panel: The on-field offside decision to disallow the goal for an offence against Quenda was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Fulham fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in BHA 4–0 AVL
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in MCI 2–1 BOU
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester City fans, Bournemouth fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in NEW 2–2 LIV
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Newcastle United fans, Liverpool fans and everyone else answered.
Goal awarded: Challenge by Ayari on Gomes. Panel: The panel felt that the challenge did not meet the high threshold for a foul, therefore, the Referee's call to award the goal was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Sending off dismissal not given: Actions of Gomes on Rutter. VAR intervened and the decision was overturned. Panel: The VAR intervention to award a red card for violent conduct was unanimously supported. Gomes kicked out at Rutter after the ball had gone.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Torres. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Torres was supported. His arms were in an expected position when aerially challenging for the ball.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Goal not awarded: Kostoulas in an offside position. Panel: The on-field offside decision to disallow the goal for an offence against Kostoulas was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by McGinn on Osman. Panel: The panel were split, 4:1, with the majority feeling that a penalty should have been awarded on-field. McGinn steps into challenge Osman and makes contact without playing the ball. Whilst the majority of the panel preferred the outcome to be a penalty, with the high threshold for VAR intervention, the majority, 3:2, felt that it was not a clear and obvious error.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Goal awarded: Rutter in an onside position. Panel: The on-field onside decision to award the goal was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Scott on Lewis. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty was supported, with there being minimal contact made by Scott on Lewis; and therefore below the threshold for a penalty.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester City fans, Bournemouth fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Smith on Semenyo. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty was supported, with there being minimal contact made by Smith which was below the threshold for a foul.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester City fans, Bournemouth fans and everyone else answered.
Goal not awarded: Gvardiol in an offside position. VAR intervened and the decision was overturned. Panel: The panel supported the VAR intervention to award the goal with Gvardiol judged to be factually onside.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester City fans, Bournemouth fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Jacquet on Osula. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty was supported with Jacquet clearly playing the ball, with any contact being expected following a challenge.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Newcastle United fans, Liverpool fans and everyone else answered.
Deep in stoppage time Stuart Attwell gave Liverpool a penalty after Lewis Hall stepped across Víctor Muñoz. Dominik Szoboszlai converted for 2-2. The KMI panel unanimously backed the call and VAR's decision not to intervene.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Newcastle United fans, Liverpool fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Thiaw. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Thiaw was supported. His arms were in a justifiable position by his side.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Newcastle United fans, Liverpool fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in HUL 2–0 MUN
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Hull City fans, Manchester United fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in EVE 2–0 CRY
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Everton fans, Crystal Palace fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in IPS 2–1 SUN
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Ipswich Town fans, Sunderland fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in NFO 0–1 LEE
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Nottingham Forest fans, Leeds United fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in BRE 3–0 TOT
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brentford fans, Tottenham Hotspur fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty awarded: Challenge by Bentancur on Schade. Panel: The panel supported the Referee's call of a penalty for a foul by Bentancur. Contact was made into the back of Schade, reaching the threshold for a penalty kick.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brentford fans, Tottenham Hotspur fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Senesi on Collins. Panel: The panel unanimously supported the Referee's call of no penalty, understanding that there is a slight pull on Collins' shirt, but judging that Collins had initially instigated the contact with Senesi before going to ground.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brentford fans, Tottenham Hotspur fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Gallagher. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Gallagher was supported. Gallagher's arm was in a justifiable position with the defender right in front of him.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brentford fans, Tottenham Hotspur fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against van Hecke. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against van Hecke was supported. His arms were tucked in and the ball hits from close proximity.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brentford fans, Tottenham Hotspur fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Canvot on Branthwaite. Panel: The on-field offside call against Branthwaite was supported as the offside offence occurred before the possible penalty. The panel felt that had an offside offence not taken place a penalty should have been awarded for the challenge by Canvot.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Everton fans, Crystal Palace fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Richards. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Richards was supported. The ball deflected off his own body changing trajectory before making contact with his arm.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Everton fans, Crystal Palace fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Mazraoui. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Mazraoui was supported. The ball was struck from close proximity with the defender's arms in an expected position given his blocking action.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Hull City fans, Manchester United fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Xhaka. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Xhaka was supported. His arms were in an expected position when stooping to head the ball.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Ipswich Town fans, Sunderland fans and everyone else answered.
Sending off dismissal not given: Challenge by Aina on Justin. Panel: The panel unanimously supported the Referee's call of a yellow card for a reckless challenge on the basis that Aina's challenge was low and made minimal contact with his leading leg - lacking the force and intensity to be serious foul play.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Nottingham Forest fans, Leeds United fans and everyone else answered.
Goal not awarded: Wilson in an offside position. Panel: The on-field offside decision to disallow the goal for an offence against Wilson was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Nottingham Forest fans, Leeds United fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in ARS 3–0 COV
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Arsenal fans, Coventry City fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Van Ewijk. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Van Ewijk was supported. The arms were in a justifiable position within the bodyline.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Arsenal fans, Coventry City fans and everyone else answered.
Goal awarded: White in an onside position. Panel: The on-field onside decision to award the goal was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Arsenal fans, Coventry City fans and everyone else answered.
Nothing here with that flair yet.