Aston Villa fans
Rate the refereeing in AVL 1–2 NFO
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in HUL 0–0 AVL
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Hull City fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in AVL 0–1 ARS
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Kamara on Havertz. Panel: The panel supported the referee's call of no penalty with the contact made being below the threshold for a penalty.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by Torres on Calafiori. Panel: The panel supported the referee's call of no penalty with the contact made being below the threshold for a penalty.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Second caution dismissal not given: Challenge by Tzolis on McGinn. Panel: The non-award of a second caution was unanimously supported with a good advantage played and therefore the challenge did not stop the promising attack. The panel also felt that the first caution was below the threshold.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by White on Maatsen. Panel: The panel supported the referee's call of no penalty with the contact made being below the threshold for a penalty.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
In the eighth minute of added time, Ian Maatsen, already on a yellow, caught Bruno Guimarães' standing leg without touching the ball. Jarred Gillett played on and VAR did not recommend a review. The KMI panel ruled 5-0 that it was a penalty and a second yellow. Arsenal won 1-0 through Saka regardless.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty awarded: Challenge by Maatsen on Saka. VAR intervened and the decision was overturned. Panel: The VAR intervention to award a free kick instead of a penalty was unanimously supported with the foul occurring just outside the area.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Rate the refereeing in BHA 4–0 AVL
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Goal awarded: Challenge by Ayari on Gomes. Panel: The panel felt that the challenge did not meet the high threshold for a foul, therefore, the Referee's call to award the goal was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Sending off dismissal not given: Actions of Gomes on Rutter. VAR intervened and the decision was overturned. Panel: The VAR intervention to award a red card for violent conduct was unanimously supported. Gomes kicked out at Rutter after the ball had gone.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Handball appeal against Torres. Panel: The Referee's call of no penalty for a potential handball offence against Torres was supported. His arms were in an expected position when aerially challenging for the ball.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Goal not awarded: Kostoulas in an offside position. Panel: The on-field offside decision to disallow the goal for an offence against Kostoulas was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not awarded: Challenge by McGinn on Osman. Panel: The panel were split, 4:1, with the majority feeling that a penalty should have been awarded on-field. McGinn steps into challenge Osman and makes contact without playing the ball. Whilst the majority of the panel preferred the outcome to be a penalty, with the high threshold for VAR intervention, the majority, 3:2, felt that it was not a clear and obvious error.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Goal awarded: Rutter in an onside position. Panel: The on-field onside decision to award the goal was supported.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brighton & Hove Albion fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
The goal was initially not given, but awarded after a VAR review. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester City fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester City fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Burnley fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
A penalty was given on the field but overturned after a VAR review. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, West Ham United fans and everyone else answered.
VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Chelsea fans and everyone else answered.
Penalty not given for an Olivier Boscagli foul on Tammy Abraham. The KMI panel ruled the on-field decision wrong, but not a clear and obvious error, so VAR was right not to intervene.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Brighton & Hove Albion fans and everyone else answered.
VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Brentford fans and everyone else answered.
The KMI panel ruled that James Garner should have been shown a second yellow card. Second cautions were not reviewable by VAR in 2025-26.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Everton fans and everyone else answered.
The KMI panel ruled that Mikel Merino should have been shown a second yellow card. Second cautions were not reviewable by VAR in 2025-26.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Arsenal fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
The goal was initially not given, but awarded after a VAR review. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Arsenal fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
The KMI panel ruled that André should have been shown a second yellow card. Second cautions were not reviewable by VAR in 2025-26.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Wolverhampton Wanderers fans and everyone else answered.
The card was upgraded to red after a VAR review. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Wolverhampton Wanderers fans and everyone else answered.
VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Liverpool fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Brentford goal disallowed for a push on Emiliano Martínez. The KMI panel ruled the on-field decision wrong, but not a clear and obvious error, so VAR was right not to intervene.
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Brentford fans, Aston Villa fans and everyone else answered.
Nothing here with that flair yet.