h/nottinghamforestCommunities ▾
NFO

h/nottinghamforest

Nottingham Forest fans

📌 Community highlights

PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via ESPN

Forest goal ruled out for handball (NFO 0–0 TOT, 67')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

Williams scored for Forest, but the ball had hit his arm immediately before he put it in. A goalscorer's accidental handball is still an offence, so the goal was disallowed and VAR confirmed it. The game finished 0-0.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Nottingham Forest fans, Tottenham Hotspur fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Forest penalty for Alisson on Williams judged wrong by panel (LIV 2–2 NFO, 68')

Refereeing CallError

Penalty awarded: Challenge by Alisson on Williams. Panel: The panel felt that the referee's call of a penalty was incorrect on-field, 3:2. The contact from Allison was inevitable as a consequence of his momentum in attempting to save the ball - the contact made was not reckless and below the threshold for a penalty. However, the non-intervention by the VAR was unanimously supported on the basis that it was not a clear and obvious error.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Liverpool fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Goal awarded: jesus in an onside position (LIV 2–2 NFO, 24')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

Goal awarded: Jesus in an onside position. Panel: The on-field onside decision to award the goal was supported.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Liverpool fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Wirtz equaliser ruled out for Frimpong offside (LIV 2–2 NFO, 32')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

Goal awarded: Frimpong in an onside position. VAR intervened and the decision was overturned. Panel: The VAR overturn to disallow the goal for an offside offence against Frimpong was supported. When the ball was played, by Wirtz, Frimpong was in an offside position and then plays the ball himself. Whilst the pass makes contact with a defender this is not a 'controlled action'.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Liverpool fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Sending off dismissal not given: challenge by Aina on Justin (NFO 0–1 LEE, 17')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

Sending off dismissal not given: Challenge by Aina on Justin. Panel: The panel unanimously supported the Referee's call of a yellow card for a reckless challenge on the basis that Aina's challenge was low and made minimal contact with his leading leg - lacking the force and intensity to be serious foul play.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Nottingham Forest fans, Leeds United fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Goal not awarded: wilson in an offside position (NFO 0–1 LEE, 26')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

Goal not awarded: Wilson in an offside position. Panel: The on-field offside decision to disallow the goal for an offence against Wilson was supported.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Nottingham Forest fans, Leeds United fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via BBC Sport

Cunha goal allowed after Mbeumo trapped the ball with his arm (MUN 3–2 NFO, 55')

Refereeing CallError

Bryan Mbeumo trapped Diogo Dalot's cross between his arm and hip before Matheus Cunha scored. VAR correctly sent referee Michael Salisbury to the monitor, but he kept the goal, calling the handball accidental. PGMOL admitted the next day that the goal should not have stood. It was worth two points to United.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Manchester United fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

João Pedro goal ruled out by VAR (CHE 1–3 NFO, 75')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Penalty to Nottingham Forest after VAR review (CHE 1–3 NFO, 13')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

The penalty was awarded following a VAR review. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Dan Ndoye goal ruled out by VAR (NFO 0–0 FUL, 65')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Nottingham Forest fans, Fulham fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Alexis Mac Allister goal ruled out by VAR (NFO 0–1 LIV, 90'+2')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Nottingham Forest fans, Liverpool fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Crysencio Summerville goal ruled out by VAR (WHU 1–2 NFO, 52')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how West Ham United fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Penalty to Nottingham Forest after VAR review (WHU 1–2 NFO, 86')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

The penalty was awarded following a VAR review. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how West Ham United fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via BBC Sport

Rúben Dias escapes a second yellow card (NFO 1–2 MCI, —)

Refereeing CallError

The KMI panel ruled that Rúben Dias should have been shown a second yellow card. Second cautions were not reviewable by VAR in 2025-26.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Nottingham Forest fans, Manchester City fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments
PLh/premierleague•u/FootyVibe••via Premier League

Igor Jesus goal ruled out by VAR (WOL 0–1 NFO, 41')

Refereeing CallCorrect call

VAR reviewed the goal and it was disallowed. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Wolverhampton Wanderers fans, Nottingham Forest fans and everyone else answered.

Vote
Comments